Your tip

'Missing' Anchor Was 'At Risk' Family Had 'Serious Concerns About Her Welfare,' Says Sheriff's Department

//santa barbara police paula lopez

Feb. 28 2013, Published 5:58 p.m. ET

Link to FacebookShare to XShare to Email

The curious case of the "missing" Santa Barbara TV anchor who was safe and sound all along has catapulted Paula Lopez from the screens of local TV to a national news sensation, and has exclusive details on the strange drama.

A panicked phone call reporting that the 48-year-old television personality had vanished on Wednesday immediately sparked a full emergency search, despite her having been seen earlier in the day, because her worried family considered her to be "at risk," a spokesperson from the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Department reveals, insisting that Lopez did not receive any preferential treatment.

Article continues below advertisement

"She was an 'at risk missing person.' Her family had serious reason to be concerned about her welfare and to think that she could need urgent medical attention, but I can't give any medical history or personal information," Kelly Hoover, Public Information Specialist for the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Department, tells in an exclusive interview.

"When we have a missing person who is at risk we immediately do exactly what we did to search for them," she says, explaining: "Our specialty units were called in -  that included two canine units, a search and rescue helicopter and eight personnel from search and rescue."

As previously reported, Lopez, a popular TV news anchor for KEYT-TV was reported missing at 10 am Wednesday even though her family had seen her just 30 minutes earlier at their house -- they subsequently called back at 5.30 pm revealing that she was "home and safe."

Such a full scale reaction to a grown woman who was "missing"  for just half an hour has prompted complaints from many tax payers who believe their money was wasted on a "cry wolf" scenario because Lopez's husband is Superior Court Judge Frank Ochoa -- however the Sheriff's Department says that was not the case at all.

Breaking News
Article continues below advertisement

"The only preferential treatment that Paula received is that we were more vague about the exact location of the search because her husband is a Superior Court judge and his address is private. We gave a more general area, whereas normally we would be more specific," Hoover tells

As for the price tag of the fruitless manhunt, she insists the cost was not nearly as high as people assume thanks to the fast response from many parties.

"The canines were already on duty, the search and rescue uses volunteers and the air unit helicopter was working on several different calls – they probably spent 1.5 hours on the search, at $220 per hour," explains the Sheriff's spokesperson.

"When a person is at risk and has no history of going missing, our job is to find them safely regardless of who they are or how much it costs, but in this case the cost was minimal," she says, adding that they have more reason to find someone if it is believed they need medical attention. "Paula is safe at home with her family now. We are grateful she is back."



Opt-out of personalized ads

© Copyright 2024 RADAR ONLINE™️. A DIVISION OF EMPIRE MEDIA GROUP INC. RADAR ONLINE is a registered trademark. All rights reserved. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Cookies Policy. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services. Offers may be subject to change without notice.