CNN Correspondent Alex Marquardt Admitted He Had ‘No Evidence’ to Accuse Military Veteran of Criminality in On-Air Hit Job — as Network Braces for $1 Billion Court Battle
In an unredacted transcript, CNN's Alex Marquardt admitted he had "no evidence" linking a Navy veteran to the black market trade.
July 24 2024, Published 10:47 p.m. ET
CNN's chief national security correspondent Alex Marquardt testified he had "no evidence" linking a decorated Navy veteran to the black market trade of Afghan refugees before airing a report that sparked a $1 billion defamation lawsuit against the embattled network.
RadarOnline.com obtained an unredacted transcript from Marquardt's deposition in the ongoing case filed by Zachary Young, who alleges the struggling network wanted viewers to believe he was "operating in a black market."
Young's allegations stem from a November 2021 episode of The Lead With Jake Tapper that showed his photo during a discussion about the repercussions of America's botched withdrawal from Afghanistan.
Marquardt said during the deposition that the segment, which aired on Jake Tapper's show, aimed to wrongly "expose" Young for "taking part in this black market that was exploiting Afghans at their most vulnerable time."
"The clear effect of the first few seconds of the Segment is to set up a false narrative of Young serving desperate Afghans on an illegal market—which he never did," the lawsuit filed in Florida states.
Young's lawyers argued in a recent filing that the show's producers "intended to target Young", and that "Marquardt, the Segment’s author and architect" — "admitted it at deposition."
When asked, "Did your reporting ever discover anything illegal that was going on with regards to the evacuation process?" Marquardt responded, "No, it didn't", the transcript shows.
The military vet alleges CNN "published defamatory statements" that ruined his reputation.
The correspondent was then asked: "Did you think Mr. Young was committing a crime?" to which he answered: "No. As far as I knew...he was simply asking for large amounts of money to get Afghans out of the country."
"You found no evidence of Mr. Young committing a crime, correct?"
"No."
Marquardt testified that CNN was "using Mr. Young as an example of what was going on here: This black market, the exorbitant fees, the taking advantage of these Afghans – the exploitation."
CNN "aggressively shared" the allegedly defamatory statements "across numerous social medial platforms", according to Young's lawyers.
- CNN Slammed for 'Shameless Hour of Kamala Harris Propaganda' — With VP Blasted as 'Flip-Flopping Lightweight'
- Former CNN Reporter Accuses Network of Inflicting 'Psychological, Financial and Physical Stress' by 'Kicking Her Unfair Dismissal Legal Battle Into Long Grass'
- 'Desperate' CNN Torn to Shreds Over Flimsy Taliban Law Argument in Navy Vet's $1B Defamation Suit: 'Sinks to a New Low'
He explained during the deposition that he and the show's producers wanted to do the story as a way of "exposing" Young for "taking part in this black market that was exploiting Afghans at their most vulnerable time."
Young complained that in the resulting report, the alleged "defamatory statements on black markets" were "emblazoned across" photos of LinkedIn messages he sent "and over a photograph of Young's face".
His lawyers wrote in their filing: "The Segment was subsequently re-broadcast on other CNN shows, which aired both domestically and internationally."
"Three of these subsequent broadcasts repeated the accusation that Young operated in 'black markets'".
Afterward, CNN "aggressively shared these same statements across numerous social medial platforms", the suit alleges.
CNN issued a correction five months after the broadcast saying the term "black market" was used "in error".
Text messages exposed during the court battle revealed that show staffers called Young a “s---bag” and “a------” while conceding the story was “full of holes like Swiss cheese" and "very much not ready for prime time".
Zachary Young is suing the network for alleged defamation after his photo was broadcast during a discussion about America's botched withdrawal from Afghanistan.
Marquardt even reportedly quipped to a colleague: "It’s your funeral bucko”, in reference to Young, before the broadcast.
The military vet's lawyers have predicted they could win up to a billion dollars if the court agrees that "CNN published defamatory statements that harmed Mr. Young, ruined his reputation, and destroyed his business."
The network has said it did not intend to cause harm, argued the language used was either opinion or ambiguous, and called the internal communications “journalistic bravado that reflected a sincere belief in the reporting.”
CNN's lawyers also recently moved to block the veteran's bid to depose host Jake Tapper in the case, arguing that doing so would cause “annoyance and embarrassment” to Tapper while “providing little useful information.”
In a "partial summary judgement" request made last month, Young's lawyers asked the court to agree that their client "never operated in an illegal market", and that CNN's statements regarding the Afghan black markets during the report were "of and concerning" Young.
The next hearing is scheduled for August 12, and a civil jury trial is set to begin in January 2025.
Powered by RedCircle