Your tip
Your tip
RadarOnlineRadarOnline
or
Sign in with lockrMail

Andy Cohen Fires Back: Asks Judge to Dismiss 'Speculative' and 'Demonstrably False' Lawsuit From Leah McSweeney Claiming Drugs, Booze and Discrimination

andy cohen leah mcsweeney lawsuit
Source: MEGA

Andy Cohen has asked a judge to dismiss Leah McSweeney's 'speculative' and 'demonstrably false' lawsuit claiming drugs, booze, and discrimination.

May 25 2024, Published 10:35 a.m. ET

RadarOnline CommentsLink to FacebookShare to XShare to FlipboardShare to Email

Bravo's Andy Cohen has fired back against former Real Housewives of New York star Leah McSweeney, asking a judge to toss out her "speculative" and "demonstrably false" discrimination lawsuit, RadarOnline.com has learned.

In a federal lawsuit filed last month and obtained by RadarOnline.com, McSweeney claimed that Cohen "tormented, demoralized, demeaned, harassed and retaliated" against her "because she is a woman with disabilities, such as alcohol use disorder and various mental health disorders, all in the name of selling drama."

The complaint, which also listed Warner Bros Discovery, Shed Media, Bravo Media, and NBC Universal as defendants, alleged that Cohen fosters a "rotted workplace culture that uniquely depended on pressuring its employees to consume alcohol," "engages in cocaine use with Housewives and other Bravolebrities that he employs," and gives the "Housewives with whom he uses cocaine with more favorable treatment and edits."

Article continues below advertisement
leah mcsweeney rhony sues andy cohen bravo lawsuit discrimination drug use bravo stars pressured to drink real housewives new york brandi glanville
Source: MEGA

In a federal lawsuit filed last month, McSweeney claimed that Cohen "tormented, demoralized, demeaned, harassed and retaliated" against her.

Article continues below advertisement

Cohen's lawyers denied the allegations, calling them "categorically false" and demanding a public apology. Deadline reports that he, along with co-defendants NBCU, WBD, Lisa Shannon, John Paparazzo, Darren Ward, Shed Media US Inc, and Bravo Media, filed a motion this week asking U.S. District Judge Lewis J. Liman to set a date for a hearing to get the matter dismissed.

"While Plaintiff attempts to overwhelm with a 754-paragraph complaint, even a cursory review of her allegations reveals that many concern matters entirely irrelevant to her claims and most are devoid of any factual or legal support, speculative, misleading, and/or demonstrably false," Cohen's lawyers wrote in a memorandum of law supporting the motion.

Article continues below advertisement
andy cohen bravo
Source: bravo

Cohen's lawyers denied the allegations, calling them "categorically false" and demanding a public apology.

Article continues below advertisement

"Many of Plaintiff's claims, supported only by the most conclusory and threadbare allegations, should be dismissed as a matter of law," the 32-page memo continued. "The rest of Plaintiff’s claims should be dismissed because they impermissibly seek to abridge Defendants’ First Amendment rights to tailor and adjust the messages they wish to convey in their creative works, including through cast selection and other creative decisions."

"Under well-settled law, even if Defendants did want to use the Housewives franchise to feature inebriated cast members (which they do not), that message — achieved through casting and directing decisions — would be protected under the First Amendment."

Article continues below advertisement
leah mcsweeney
Source: MEGA

In response, McSweeney's lawyer Sarah Matz said, "We do not agree that the motion has merit — it mostly argues for dismissal on technical grounds essentially saying that Defendants were allowed to discriminate against Ms. McSweeney — not that they did not do it.

READ MORE ON REALITY TV
Article continues below advertisement

Never miss a story — sign up for the RadarOnline.com newsletter to get your daily dose of dope. Daily. Breaking. Celebrity news. All free.

In response, McSweeney's lawyer Sarah Matz said, "We do not agree that the motion has merit — it mostly argues for dismissal on technical grounds essentially saying that Defendants were allowed to discriminate against Ms. McSweeney — not that they did not do it."

"To agree with the Defendants would be to essentially say that the creative industries are not subject to anti-discrimination and anti-retaliation laws and that networks could engage in discrimination and retaliation with impunity, which is not the law."

Image of a woman with shocked expression

Never Miss an

Exclusive

Daily updates from the heart of Hollywood, right to your inbox

By entering your email and clicking Sign Up, you’re agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Opt-out of personalized ads

© Copyright 2024 RADAR ONLINE™️. A DIVISION OF MYSTIFY ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK INC. RADAR ONLINE is a registered trademark. All rights reserved. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Cookies Policy. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services. Offers may be subject to change without notice.