Your tip
Your tip
RadarOnlineRadarOnline
or
Sign in with lockrMail

VERDICT: Anna Nicole Smith Confidantes Howard K. Stern & Eroshevich Guilty; Kapoor Aquitted

//postuntitled

May 28 2018, Updated 10:18 a.m. ET

RadarOnline CommentsLink to FacebookShare to XShare to FlipboardShare to Email

Anna Nicole Smith’s one-time confidante Howard K. Stern, psychiatrist Khristine Eroshevich and medical internist Sandeep Kapoor discovered their fate in a Los Angeles courtroom Thursday when the verdict of the 12 person jury was read to the court.

Stern was found guilty on two of the nine charges against him – guilty of conspiracy to commit a crime and conspiracy.

COURT DOCUMENTS: Read The Verdict Forms

Article continues below advertisement

Eroshevich was found guilty on four charges including conspiracy, unlawfully prescribing an opiate and using a false name for the prescribing of an opiate. The jury was deadlocked on additional charges against the psychiatrist for furnishing prescriptions to an addict.  The judge has declared a mistrial on those charges.

EVIDENCE: Do These Photos Prove Anna Nicole Was Not A Drug Addict?

Kapoor was acquitted on all six charges against him – including two charges of conspiracy.

Article continues below advertisement

EXCLUSIVE COURT DOCUMENTS:  Read More About The Jurors' Questions

The fate of the three defendants went to the six-man, six-woman panel on October 12 and  deliberated for nearly two weeks.

Looking tired and gaunt, Howard K. Stern arrived at the courthouse 30 minutes prior to the scheduled reading of the verdict. The one-time attorney dressed in a dark suit, white shirt and blue tie appeared to be taking the fate of his future very seriously as he paced throughout the courtroom hall.

Article continues below advertisement

Kapoor arrived to court at 1:30pm PST when the verdict was scheduled to be read – Eroshevich was 5 minutes late and kept the court waiting which displeased the judge.

As RadarOnline.com previously reported, on Wednesday the jurors had two questions for the judge - the first question was: "What should we do if we are unable to come to a verdict on a count or an object crime?"  This could be a bad sign indicating the jury could be deadlocked on certain charges against the trio.

Article continues below advertisement

The second question they asked was: "If a juror were to believe that prescriptions were written in excessive amounts, does it follow that these prescriptions also have no legitimate medical purpose?"

Closing arguments earlier this month were sure to have had an impact on the jury’s verdict Thursday.

Stern's attorney told the jury there was an ``abundance of reasonable doubt'' in the prosecution's case against Stern and the two doctors.

Article continues below advertisement

But Deputy District Attorney Renee Rose said the evidence presented during the trial showed ``that these defendants knew what they were doing was wrong'' and that "they knew their conduct was unlawful.''

Kapoor's attorney, Ellyn Garofalo, said the criminal case against her client never would have been brought if Smith had not been a celebrity.

"Our laws are designed to stop (prosecutors) and law enforcement from second-guessing physicians. If Anna Nicole Smith was not a celebrity, Dr. Kapoor would not be sitting here,'' she said.

Article continues below advertisement

COURT: Anna Nicole Smith Was Obsessed With Drugs, Says Former Bodyguard

Eroshevich's attorney, Bradley Brunon, said in his closing argument that she reached out on an "emergency mission" to help Smith after Smith's son died and did what she could to try to help her in a time of crisis.

In September, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Robert J. Perry granted the defense's motion to acquit Stern of fraudulently obtaining a prescription for methadone and Dilaudid and getting a prescription for the two drugs by giving a false name.

Article continues below advertisement

The judge also knocked out a portion of the allegations in one of the conspiracy charges against Stern and Kapoor, ruling the prosecution had not presented sufficient evidence that the two had conspired to obtain a controlled substance by fraud, deceit or misrepresentation or issue a prescription that was false or fictitious.

Nine felony charges remained against Stern, including conspiracy, unlawfully prescribing a controlled substance, obtaining a prescription for opiates by fraud, deceit or misrepresentation, obtaining a prescription for opiates by giving a false name or address and prescribing, administering or dispensing a controlled substance to an addict.

Image of a woman with shocked expression

Never Miss an

Exclusive

Daily updates from the heart of Hollywood, right to your inbox

By entering your email and clicking Sign Up, you’re agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

READ MORE ON Fashion Police
Article continues below advertisement

Kapoor and Eroshevich were each charged with six felony counts.

Anna Nicole Smith died from an accidental prescription overdose in Florida on February 8, 2007.  She was 39.

Stern and Eroshevich will be sentenced on January 6th.

Spokesperson for the Los Angeles District Attorney’s office, Sandi Gibbons, tells RadarOnline.com that Stern and Eroshevich could face up to three years maximum in state prison on all charges.

On January 6, the DA will decide if they want to retry Stern and Eroshevich on the charges deadlocked by the jury. If the judge shoots down the DA’s request for retrial, the pair will be sentenced immediately.

RELATED STORIES:

Larry Birkhead Takes The Stand In Anna Nicole Drug Trial

Trio Used Fake Names To Keep Anna Nicole Drugged Says Prosecutor

EXCLUSIVE VIDEO INTERVIEW: Larry Says It's "Tough" Discussing Anna Nicole

Opt-out of personalized ads

© Copyright 2024 RADAR ONLINE™️. A DIVISION OF MYSTIFY ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK INC. RADAR ONLINE is a registered trademark. All rights reserved. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Cookies Policy. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services. Offers may be subject to change without notice.