Johnny Depp has plans to call an ex-TMZ producer to the stand on Wednesday, but the media outlet is working overtime to block him from appearing in court.
Their motion states they became aware of the development after RadarOnline.com broke the story.
TMZ said it is seeking a protective order precluding Tremaine from disclosing its privileged information during the testimony.
The company said it was unsure if Tremaine voluntarily decided to appear or was appearing pursuant to a trial subpoena. “If he is, TMZ likewise requests that the Court quash the subpoena.”
Tremaine worked for TMZ from 2015 through August 2017. He was around when the outlet obtained the bombshell video of Depp screaming at Heard in a kitchen.
In the clip, Depp slams cupboards, yells at Heard and pushes her phone after he catches her filming. The actress has denied she was behind the leak of the video for years.
On the stand, Depp’s powerhouse lawyer Camille Vasquez questioned Heard if she knew how TMZ obtained the video and whether she called the paparazzi when she filed a restraining order in court against the actor.
Vasquez asked, “You knew the media was going to be there, didn’t you?”
“No, I did not,” Heard said. “I assumed since it’s a public building, there was that possibility. But I was shocked.”
- Johnny Depp Calls Ex-TMZ Producer To Witness Box After Accusing Amber Heard Of Tipping Off Paparazzi, Leaking Explosive Video
- Judge Scoffs At TMZ's Request To Stop Ex-Employee From Testifying In Heard-Depp Trial
- Ex-TMZ Employee Tell All How Website Got Johnny Depp Kitchen Video, Ignites Questions Around Missing Seconds Of Footage
Vasquez also asked Heard, “TMZ owns the copyright now, doesn’t it? Did they pay you for that?” Heard said, “I never got paid because I had nothing to do with that.”
Depp clearly believes Tremaine has information that could help prove his claims against Heard. TMZ wants to make sure their ex-employee stays silent.
The outlet said they obtained the video from a confidential source. “TMZ promised this source that it would maintain their confidentiality and would not disclose their name or other information,” their motion reads.
“TMZ’s source has not, at any time since they provided the Video, waived their right to confidentiality or indicated to TMZ that it was released from its promise of confidentiality,” they write.
Further, they claim Tremaine “had nothing to do with TMZ’s receipt of the Video” nor does he have “first-hand knowledge of the identity of the confidential source who provided TMZ with the video.”
The company also notes if Tremaine talks if would violate his confidentiality agreement with it.
A judge has yet to rule on the motion.