Your tip
RadarOnlineRadarOnline
or
Sign in with lockrMail
BREAKING NEWS
Exclusive

Judge Throws Out Family’s Lawsuit Accusing Beetlejuice Character at Universal Studios of Using Racist Hand Gesture

universal studios lawsuit beetlejuice character employee racism judge shuts down
Source: MEGA

The family lost their case.

May 1 2024, Published 5:30 a.m. ET

Link to FacebookShare to XShare to FlipboardShare to Email
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

A family who sued Universal Studios accusing a man dressed in a Beetlejuice costume of throwing up a racist hand gesture in front of a black child lost their lawsuit.

According to court documents obtained by RadarOnline.com, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge dismissed all claims brought by John and Marisol McGee.

Article continues below advertisement
universal studios lawsuit beetlejuice character employee racism judge shuts down
Source: UNIVERSAL STUDIOS

Michael Keaton in the 1988 film.

Article continues below advertisement

As we first reported, John and Marisol were listed as plaintiffs and they also sued on behalf of a minor named John McGee.

The duo said John encountered a Universal Studios employee dressed up as Michael Keaton’s character from the 1988 film during a visit to the park in July 2021.

Article continues below advertisement
universal studios lawsuit beetlejuice character employee racism judge shuts down
Source: MEGA

Keaton played Beetlejuice and will reprise his role in the upcoming sequel.

Article continues below advertisement

The suit alleged, “Plaintiffs, who were fans of the Beetlejuice film, stopped to take a picture with defendant “Beetlejuice Doe.” Plaintiff Marisol McGee, a Latin-American woman, posed for the picture with defendant “Beetlejuice Doe” while plaintiff John McGee, an African-American man, took the picture and plaintiff Dylan McGee, a mixed-race minor boy, watched."

“In the picture, defendant “Beetlejuice Doe” displayed the racist, offensive White Power hand gesture,” the family claimed in the lawsuit.

Article continues below advertisement
universal studios lawsuit beetlejuice character employee racism judge shuts down
Source: UNIVERSAL STUDIOS

The film's poster from 1988.

MORE ON:
court

DAILY. BREAKING. CELEBRITY NEWS. ALL FREE.

Article continues below advertisement

The family claimed the “White Power” hand gesture is a “symbol used to express hatred towards a segment of the population based upon a person's race, ethnicity, color, and national origin.”

John and Marisol demanded unspecified damages for the alleged intentional infliction of emotional distress.

They said they suffered, “anguish, fright, horror, nervousness, grief, anxiety, worry, shock, humiliation, and shame” as a result of the encounter with the man dressed as Beetlejuice.

Article continues below advertisement
universal studios lawsuit beetlejuice character employee racism judge shuts down
Source: MEGA

Universal Studios denied all allegations of wrongdoing.

Article continues below advertisement

A lawyer for Universal Studios argued the hand gesture of the Beetlejuice character was most likely just a gesture to signify “okay." He argued there was no proof the employee purposely used a racist gesture.

Article continues below advertisement

“Assuming arguendo for the purpose of this demurrer that a Universal Studios Beetlejuice character did make an “okay” gesture in a photo opportunity with the Plaintiffs, it is equally plausible (and indeed more likely) that such a gesture was intended as a traditional “okay” gesture that has been in common usage in American culture for decades if not centuries,” the lawyer wrote.

“Tellingly, Plaintiffs do not include in their Complaint the photograph in which the Beetlejuice character is making such a gesture, nor do they allege any objective facts supporting that, even if made, the gesture was made as a white power symbol or with an otherwise racially derogatory meaning,” the attorney said in the official response.

At the recent hearing, the judge ruled, "The mere use of a concededly ambiguous hand signal is not enough. On this amendment, Plaintiffs have not alleged additional facts from which the Court could infer an intent to injure or deny services. Neither have they asserted that there is a reasonable possibility of curing this defect. Therefore, the demurrer is sustained without leave to amend and the action is dismissed with prejudice."

The judge closed the case.

More From Radar Online

    Opt-out of personalized ads

    © Copyright 2024 RADAR ONLINE™️. A DIVISION OF MYSTIFY ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK INC. RADAR ONLINE is a registered trademark. All rights reserved. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Cookies Policy. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services. Offers may be subject to change without notice.