Your tip

Judge: Gore's Truth Not Exactly

Oct. 27 2008, Published 7:07 a.m. ET

Link to FacebookShare to XShare to FlipboardShare to Email
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

NOT BIG IN THE UK Al (Photo: Getty Images)

An Inconvenient Truth may have been instrumental in Al Gore joining the ranks of the Dalai Lama as a Nobel Peace Prize winner, but just how truthful was Big Al in his global warming epic? Responding to a school official in the UK who did not want to screen it for his students, a British judge has ruled that the film contains errors made in "the context of alarmism and exaggeration."

Article continues below advertisement

The ruling isn't exactly shocking—the documentary was never purported to be an impartial examination of climate change, and if Michael Moore's polemics have taught us anything, it's that Oscar-winners needn't be even-handed—but considering the coincidental Nobel announcement, it is an ill-timed ruling nonetheless.

Among the nine dubious facts the judge discovered in the film: Lake Chad isn't drying up because of global warming (insufficient evidence!); Hurricane Katrina wasn't a result of global warming (insufficient evidence!); and four polar bears didn't drown because their ice forts melted away (they were killed in a storm).

Breaking News

Will Gore have time to fix the errors and take home the $125,000 prize currently being offered to anyone who can scientifically prove that global warming exists? Probably.



More From Radar Online

    Opt-out of personalized ads

    © Copyright 2024 RADAR ONLINE™️. A DIVISION OF MYSTIFY ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK INC. RADAR ONLINE is a registered trademark. All rights reserved. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Cookies Policy. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services. Offers may be subject to change without notice.