Your tip
Your tip
RadarOnlineRadarOnline
or
Sign in with lockrMail
Exclusive

‘New York Times’ Deliberately Misleading Readers With Partisan ‘Best Selling‘ Book List: Publisher

radar split connor
Source: Mega

Feb. 23 2022, Published 12:07 p.m. ET

RadarOnline CommentsLink to FacebookShare to XShare to FlipboardShare to Email

The New York Times censored its best-seller’s list and stifled views that were against the paper’s dogma on the COVID-19 pandemic, a publisher argued.

Article continues below advertisement

Democrat Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s book The Real Anthony Fauci and Donald Trump-backer Peter Navarro’s In Trump Time should have been prominent on the lists, but both were either pushed down or omitted entirely, argued Tony Lyons, Skyhorse publishing president.

Article continues below advertisement
radar split connor
Source: Mega
Article continues below advertisement

He discussed the “dangerous” decision in a recent op-ed for The Defender.

Article continues below advertisement

Both books discuss Big Pharma greed and Fauci’s corruption that led to a flawed COVID-19 pandemic response and unnecessary deaths, Lyons noted.

Article continues below advertisement

Kennedy’s book should have debuted at No. 1 on the nonfiction list and should have been ranked in the top 5 the following weeks, Lyons stated. Instead, the Times pushed it down to No. 7 or No. 8 each week.

Article continues below advertisement

The Real Anthony Fauci has sold more than 800,000 copies since its debut, more than any other hardcover book in the same period, argued Lyons.

Article continues below advertisement

The Times described Kennedy’s book as “misinformation” despite it having more than 2,000 citations and testimonials from doctors, scientists, and lawyers, Lyons noted.

Article continues below advertisement

In Trump Time should have been at No. 3 in November, when it sold 33,000 copies in a week. Instead, the Times didn’t include it in its list at all, Lyons claimed.

Article continues below advertisement
dt
Source: Mega
Article continues below advertisement

Navarro called the Times’ censorship not only "unconscionable, but dangerous.”

Article continues below advertisement

“For the Times to suppress dissent over life-and-death public health issues is not just unconscionable, it’s dangerous,” Lyons wrote. “Many of the alleged ‘facts’ we’ve been force-fed by the Times and other mainstream media outlets since the pandemic began have turned out to be either false or misleading.”

Image of a woman with shocked expression

Never Miss an

Exclusive

Daily updates from the heart of Hollywood, right to your inbox

By entering your email and clicking Sign Up, you’re agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

READ MORE ON NEWS
Article continues below advertisement

People used to check the list for an accurate report of what others are reading, Lyons argued. Instead, today it’s being used to push the paper’s narrow political views.

Article continues below advertisement
rfkj
Source: Mega

“While it’s not outright fascism, it clearly represents a blow to democracy,” Lyons wrote.

Opt-out of personalized ads

© Copyright 2024 RADAR ONLINE™️. A DIVISION OF MYSTIFY ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK INC. RADAR ONLINE is a registered trademark. All rights reserved. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Cookies Policy. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services. Offers may be subject to change without notice.