Your tip
Your tip
RadarOnlineRadarOnline
or
Sign in with lockrMail

Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes Calls Into Question Mental State Of Witness Who Provided Testimony Against Her During Trial

Elizabeth Holmes Calls Into Question Mental State Of Trial Witness
Source: Mega

Oct. 27 2022, Published 9:00 a.m. ET

RadarOnline CommentsLink to FacebookShare to XShare to FlipboardShare to Email

Disgraced Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes recently requested a court reexamine the “mental wellbeing” of one witness who provided testimony against her during her trial earlier this year, RadarOnline.com has learned.

Holmes and her legal team reportedly requested the court reexamine Dr. Adam Rosendorff.

Article continues below advertisement
Elizabeth Holmes Calls Into Question Mental State Of Trial Witness
Source: Mega

Rosendorff, who previously served as the Theranos lab director, allegedly visited Holmes in August and expressed regret regarding his testimony against the 38-year-old Theranos founder.

According to Daily Mail, Holmes argued to a District Court in San Jose on Monday that Rosendorff’s August visit provided enough reason for Judge Edward Davila to not only doubt the witness’ wellbeing but also the legitimacy of the guilty verdict handed down to Holmes as a result of Rosendorff’s witness testimony.

Article continues below advertisement

Holmes’ legal team also reportedly cited an interview Rosendorff gave to a South African Jewish publication where the doctor spoke about his history of “mental breakdowns” and “medications.”

Rosendorff has since spoken out and maintained his “mental state was solid” when he visited the pregnant Theranos founder in August.

Article continues below advertisement
Elizabeth Holmes Calls Into Question Mental State Of Trial Witness
Source: Mega

Rosendorff also recently revealed he suffered “breakdown, medication, hospitalization, and health problems” as a result of blowing the whistle on Holmes and her misconduct as a Theranos executive.

As RadarOnline.com previously reported, Holmes was found guilty of three counts of wire fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud after misleading investors about a revolutionary health diagnostic technology that could run an “array” of different tests with only a few drops of a patient’s blood.

Article continues below advertisement

She was found guilty in early January after first being charged three years before, and is set to be sentenced on November 18.

The disgraced businesswoman faces 20 years in prison for her crimes, plus a fine of $250,000 and restitution for the four counts she was found guilty of – meaning she is facing a fine of more than $1 million.

Article continues below advertisement
Elizabeth Holmes Calls Into Question Mental State Of Trial Witness
Source: Mega
Image of a woman with shocked expression

Never Miss an

Exclusive

Daily updates from the heart of Hollywood, right to your inbox

By entering your email and clicking Sign Up, you’re agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

READ MORE ON NEWS

During her trial, Rosendorff testified as a witness and explained how he felt compelled to blow the whistle on Holmes after finding she and her lover-turned-business partner, Ramesh 'Sunny' Balwani, were misleading consumers and investors about their health diagnostic technology.

“I felt pressured to vouch for tests that I did not have confidence in,” the doctor explained. “I came to believe that the company believed more about PR and fundraising than about patient care.”

If Holmes' latest request is granted, she would receive a new trial.

Opt-out of personalized ads

© Copyright 2024 RADAR ONLINE™️. A DIVISION OF MYSTIFY ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK INC. RADAR ONLINE is a registered trademark. All rights reserved. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Cookies Policy. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services. Offers may be subject to change without notice.