Your tip
RadarOnlineRadarOnline
BREAKING NEWS

DJ Paul Oakenfold Masturbated in Front of His Personal Assistant Four Times in a Single Day, New Lawsuit Claims

Embedded Image
Source: mega

Jun. 4 2023, Published 12:01 p.m. ET

Link to FacebookShare to XShare to Email

Famous DJ and movie composer Paul Oakenfold is accused of repeatedly touching himself in front of a former personal assistant, RadarOnline.com has learned.

Article continues below advertisement
Embedded Image
Source: mega

24-year-old Jane Roe filed a sexual harassment and workplace violation lawsuit on Friday, June 2, in LA Superior Court.

In the lawsuit, she alleges that two companies run by CEO Paul Stepanek, New Frequency Management and Stepanek Management, Oakenfold, and various "John Does" violated her employment rights.

Article continues below advertisement
Embedded Image
Source: mega
Article continues below advertisement

According to the suit, Roe was hired by New Frequency in October 2022 and was assigned to work as a personal assistant to Oakenfold for $20 an hour.

Roe worked out of the home of the Grammy-nominated DJ who has remixed the music of several big-name artists, including U2, Madonna, Britney Spears and the Rolling Stones.

Article continues below advertisement

She is suing for damages over $25,000 for the management companies assigning her to be Oakenfold's personal assistant.

On her first day, she claims that the DJ exposed himself and masturbated in front of her on four separate occasions — once inside her own car.

MORE ON:
crime
Article continues below advertisement
Embedded Image
Source: mega
Article continues below advertisement

After reporting the incident to her management team, Roe said that she was asked to sign a nondisclosure agreement. She was allegedly prevented from returning to work when she did not sign and was supposedly told that she to be fired if she refused.

The lawsuit says that Roe eventually signed the NDA "under duress" and was reassigned so that she wouldn't have to be around Oakenfold. However, the hired assistant claimed that her hours were reduced and that she was eventually laid off in March 2023 for what the filing called "a lack of work."

Article continues below advertisement
Article continues below advertisement

The lawsuit states, "Defendants terminated Plaintiff not for any legitimate reason, but in retaliation for Plaintiff's complaints about the aforementioned sexual harassment, in violation of the law."

Never miss a story — sign up for the RadarOnline.com newsletter to get your daily dose of dope. Daily. Breaking. Celebrity news. All free.

Advertisement

DAILY. BREAKING. CELEBRITY NEWS. ALL FREE.

Opt-out of personalized ads

© Copyright 2024 RADAR ONLINE™️. A DIVISION OF EMPIRE MEDIA GROUP INC. RADAR ONLINE is a registered trademark. All rights reserved. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Cookies Policy. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services. Offers may be subject to change without notice.