![]() seabear70's Profile
My Comments
Posted by: seabear70 on December 19, 2007 11:05 AM So, are we all agreed that this is not a conspiracy? LOL Here's the thing, there is way more evidence in this article that the Dims are hiding something than the Republicans, which still means there is nothing here to persue. What has happened is that privacy laws and the shift to electronic storage have increased the number of documents legally required to be destroyed dramatically. Yet it's ok if people throw this BS story in the faces of the republicans, if I turn it around and show the evidence that the Dims are the ones responsible, then it make this a whole different game now, doesn't it? Posted by: seabear70 on December 16, 2007 12:55 PM Interesting how in the wrong hands, the truth can quickly become a lie... [QUOTE] Behold, the Bush Administration in chart form: Federal spending on paper shredding has increased more than 600 percent since George W. Bush took office. [/QUOTE] However, the truth is a little different... First of all, of the top 5 districts that contract out schredding services, four are controlled by democrats. Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed
Internal Revenue Service $5,471,067
Paper Shredding Services $13,079,687
What I find interesting is that given the locations of where the money is being spent, and the breakdown in actual expendatures, the one place that can not be easily explained for having a huge paper schredding budget is the current home of Hillary Clinton.
Posted by: seabear70 on December 15, 2007 12:22 PM |
|
|
||||
| ||||||
Interesting laurance...
You've actually managed to turn a failed conspiracy into a laughing stock by suggesting that the IRS, the DHS, etc's schredding papers is as a result of Bush, even after I managed to point out how stupid this article is.
Tell me something...
How big a warerhouse would be required to store the paperwork that is required by law to be destroyed containing confidential information if it was kept forever?