Addenum:

My symbol for militant corporatism (fascism):

http://www.light-to-dark.com/dubya_who.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_Germany

Nationalist Socialist Workers Party=Nazi Party.

I define fascism as militant corporatism.

O'Reilly may be the dumbest man working for nationalist socialist Rupert Murdoch.

Keith Olbermann has done more to expose screamer O'Reilly and his polarization machine than any other American, and his show's growing popularity reflects it.

The agenda of O'Reilly includes lying, dishonesty, and provocation without allowing reasoned discourse-a favorite strategy of those who tend to polarize America. The fact is, with so much negative attention lately, O'Reilly's hand has been getting called, and the result is his apparent mental meltdown.

http://www.light-to-dark.com/coulter_limbaugh_oreilly.html

This extension of Murdochian pet, Roger Ailes, appeals to the emotive aspect of viewers rather than elements of higher thinking, much the same way as Ann Coulter whose greatest enemy beyond Liberals is the First Amendment, operates. These extremist simply cannot tolerate people who actually think.

http://www.light-to-dark.com/ann_coulter_republican.html

Beck and Savage round out the caveman-level mentalities offered by the farthest right's provocateurs. Fox's Ailes, O'Reilly's boss, has proven to be the perfect reflection of his bosses' sensibilities and intent.

http://www.light-to-dark.com/ruperts_brains.html

The reason this nation survived so long is due to reasoned discourse, honesty, choice, liberty, and the courage to face all views-particularly dissenting ones. What we get from Shrill Bill is anything but fairness and integrity. He is the quintessential Foxian and will cut the mic from any voice that dares to threaten his argument.

The antedote for this destructive, divisive mindset is the restoration of the Fairness Doctrine, so that Fox and it's agents would have to offer more than a one-sided, continuous flow of nationalist socialist spewage. They would have to provide equal time to genuine dissenting views so that viewers could draw logical conclusions based on weighing choices, which our country and it's Constitution were founded upon.

I applaud Mr. Olbermann for shining a light on O'Reilly's circus of raucous imbalance and dishonesty.