Wow, Sarah- You are right on. Why in the world would we subcontract the hunting of probably the most notorious criminal in US history to companies to professional ex-military experts? I definitely think we should keep sending our young (18 years old), inexperienced (12 weeks of training) soldiers to Iraq to die. I mean most casualties are coming from ied's and boobytraps, so hell yeah, keep sending thousands of our boys over to die, for what now? Exactly what will America win in this war? How exactly are they (Iraqis) threatning our National Security? 9-11? Oh that was the Suadi's. Hmm. WMD? None found.
Why on Earth would we use a process outlined by the constitution (Letters of Marque and Reprisal) to capture this guy when we can just go to war, stimulate the economy and further the nation building agenda of the NEW UNITED STATES OF AMERICAN EMPIRE.
If that sounds off base to you, I submit that you, and others with your line of thinking, are willfully deluding yourself.
Stick to Us Weekly, it seems to be more your speed. Your website boasts "POP, POLITICS, SCANDAL & STYLE" This reminds me of a recurring skit on Sesame Street where there would be 4 items, say (1) a basesball (2) a basketball (3) a soccerball and finally (4) a hammer. A cheery limerick would then play encouraging viewers to determine 'Which one of these things is not like the other?' Well in the case of your website, which one would it be?
I'll bet this story gets more hits that any story you've ever posted, simply because you mention Ron Paul. (doesn't apply if previous stories cover Ron though, but I'll bet they don't)
Wow, Sarah- You are right on. Why in the world would we subcontract the hunting of probably the most notorious criminal in US history to companies to professional ex-military experts? I definitely think we should keep sending our young (18 years old), inexperienced (12 weeks of training) soldiers to Iraq to die. I mean most casualties are coming from ied's and boobytraps, so hell yeah, keep sending thousands of our boys over to die, for what now? Exactly what will America win in this war? How exactly are they (Iraqis) threatning our National Security? 9-11? Oh that was the Suadi's. Hmm. WMD? None found.
Why on Earth would we use a process outlined by the constitution (Letters of Marque and Reprisal) to capture this guy when we can just go to war, stimulate the economy and further the nation building agenda of the NEW UNITED STATES OF AMERICAN EMPIRE.
If that sounds off base to you, I submit that you, and others with your line of thinking, are willfully deluding yourself.
Stick to Us Weekly, it seems to be more your speed. Your website boasts "POP, POLITICS, SCANDAL & STYLE" This reminds me of a recurring skit on Sesame Street where there would be 4 items, say (1) a basesball (2) a basketball (3) a soccerball and finally (4) a hammer. A cheery limerick would then play encouraging viewers to determine 'Which one of these things is not like the other?' Well in the case of your website, which one would it be?
I'll bet this story gets more hits that any story you've ever posted, simply because you mention Ron Paul. (doesn't apply if previous stories cover Ron though, but I'll bet they don't)