![]() emma's Profile
My Comments
Posted by: emma on July 22, 2008 5:21 PM Ok -- first and foremost -- if you had survived the 70's fine -- you would not be defending inappropriate behavior -- you would realize how wrong it was to do all of those things -- second to smoke in front of any child is WRONG!!! -- but to expose a child to secondhand smoke is REALLY WRONG!!! -- would we allow a babysitter to get away with this type of behavior -- NO -- he/she would have been excused -- and basically Britney is a babysitter to her children -- she sees them like three hours a week -- if she can not be in control of the environment and what they are exposed to in three hours -- then she is not fit to be a full-time parent -- besides the fact that the area is not secure that paps can view and photograph the child is alarming -- notice that there are no pictures of Federline and the children -- he probably has secured his living space -- plus Britney's house seems not to be child-friendly -- there is a glass table? -- candles? -- without reiterating the fact that there is a dish with lighters and cigerettes on the table? -- within a child's reach -- plus what about the exposed extension cord on the floor -- the child could EASILY trip over it -- smashing into a marble floor? -- it seems that there are too many things WRONG here!!! Posted by: emma on July 22, 2008 4:46 PM Ok -- first and foremost -- if you had survived the 70's fine -- you would not be defending inappropriate behavior -- you would realize how wrong it was to do all of those things -- second to smoke in front of any child is WRONG!!! -- but to expose a child to secondhand smoke is REALLY WRONG!!! -- would we allow a babysitter to get away with this type of behavior -- NO -- he/she would have been excused -- and basically Britney is a babysitter to her children -- she sees them like three hours a week -- if she can not be in control of the environment and what they are exposed to in three hours -- then she is not fit to be a full-time parent -- besides the fact that the area is not secure that paps can view and photograph the child is alarming -- notice that there are no pictures of Federline and the children -- he probably has secured his living space -- plus Britney's house seems not to be child-friendly -- there is a glass table? -- candles? -- without reiterating the fact that there is a dish with lighters and cigerettes on the table? -- within a child's reach -- plus what about the exposed extension cord on the floor -- the child could EASILY trip over it -- smashing into a marble floor? -- it seems that there are too many things WRONG here!!! Posted by: emma on July 22, 2008 4:45 PM |
|
|
||||
| ||||||
I am sorry -- truly I am -- that your parents continue to smoke around you despite the fact that you have a serious asthma condition -- not ALL parents are insensitive to their children's plight -- when a person has a child their focus changes -- the needs of the children come first -- but in regards to Britney -- she seems callous to the physical, emotional, and psychological development of her children -- folks childhood is SACRED!!! -- parents try to preserve it for as long as possible -- sadly Britney's children have been denied this -- parenting is about nurturing souls -- not defending your behavior as right -- it is about doing what's right for the sake of your children