catatonic's Profile
My Comments

Can you blame her? Everything I read says the magazine was doing well (ad pages and circulation) when Jane Pratt was at the helm. When she was pushed out and they redid the magazine it dropped a ton in circ and as pages. I can see why she feels the way she does, she started it and was pushed out. Mixed emotions would be how I would feel. However, the way you write the piece and the headline"MAGLOMANIA!" shows you have an angle and that you clearly do not like her. So, skewering her for how everyone in her position would feel is BS.

I am an avid magazine reader and loved Sassy and Jane so I followed this closely, and anything written by you since Jane left has been negative about her. When Falling Out of Fashion, a book by her assistant came out that put Jane in a positive light you trashed that as well. Is it possible, that Jane is all bad? All right she is a bit of a star-f@#ker but you have to say that Sassy and Jane were pretty groundbreaking so, she must have had some skill.

Getting checks from Conde Nast or just looking to get a job from them one day Karl I mean Jeff?

Posted by: catatonic on July 10, 2007 11:08 AM


 
Most Recommendations

Aguilera: Nicole's A Great Mom

China Blasts Guns N' Roses

I'm Getting Better

It's Not Harry Potter, But...

Gregory Set To Meet The Press




Sexual Politics
Election 2008 Hasn't Just Been Dirty, It's Been Downright Smutty

Full Court Press
Bill Kristol, Jane Mayer, and the Rest of This Week's Winners and Sinners

Adult Friends Forever
With More Than 30 Million Users, Adult FriendFinder Is the Web's No. 1 Meat Market. But What Kinds of Kinksters Actually Use the Site? Radar Signed Up to Find Out

Full Court Press
Charles Kaiser on the Final Presidential Debate

Snort Selling
Radar's Investment Guide to Cocaine, Hookers, and Other Vices




Thanks, Mom

Balfour's Got No Bail

Star's Brother Shot

AnnaLynne Is The Cat's Meow

Brad Gets Clooney On Ellen








Home     Contact     Terms and Conditions     Advertise     privacy policy