My Comments
I'll repeat myself only once. Nothing adduced here is evidence for Bush claiming Saddam had a hand in 9/11. Period. End of Sentence.
As for Saddam's terrorism connection, it is public record. Go look it up. You don't need George Bush to tell you about Saddam's support of jihad groups and Palestinian suicide bombers.
Not one thing you mentioned works as evidence that Bush asserted that Saddam had a hand in the events of September 11.
Nothing. You can argue against the war all you want, but don't make these non-points. They degrade the issue, and erode the whole critical concept of how we know what we know. Don't muck it up with what you wished you could prove but can't quite.
|
|
Linda Greenhouse, legendary New York Times reporter looks back on three decades chronicling the Supreme Court—including her run-ins with the journalism ethics police
Radar's guide to discussing Mad Men properly
Can you tell the difference between real upcoming movies and Radar's fakes?
Charles Kaiser on Conservative Pundits' Love Affair with Sarah Palin
Good news and bad news for Obama, farewell to Paul Newman, and this Week's Winners and Sinners


|
|
 |
I'll repeat myself only once. Nothing adduced here is evidence for Bush claiming Saddam had a hand in 9/11. Period. End of Sentence.
As for Saddam's terrorism connection, it is public record. Go look it up. You don't need George Bush to tell you about Saddam's support of jihad groups and Palestinian suicide bombers.