My Comments
The reason the other video was so damning was it showed his thought process at work--the emotional instability and sloganeering of an incurable zealot. In this video he's not so manifestly batshit. He just seems hammy and excessively enthusiastic, something you'd expect of a man who makes gobs of money looking intensely at a camera.
Still he's pretty fucking crazy.
There is a beautiful parity in seeing a ridiculous religion get taken down by a ridiculous internet movement. Member of anonymous, my psychic energy goes out to you.
|
|
Linda Greenhouse, legendary New York Times reporter looks back on three decades chronicling the Supreme Court—including her run-ins with the journalism ethics police
Radar's guide to discussing Mad Men properly
Can you tell the difference between real upcoming movies and Radar's fakes?
Charles Kaiser on Conservative Pundits' Love Affair with Sarah Palin
Good news and bad news for Obama, farewell to Paul Newman, and this Week's Winners and Sinners
|
|
 |
The reason the other video was so damning was it showed his thought process at work--the emotional instability and sloganeering of an incurable zealot. In this video he's not so manifestly batshit. He just seems hammy and excessively enthusiastic, something you'd expect of a man who makes gobs of money looking intensely at a camera.
Still he's pretty fucking crazy.