With all the bad press Scientology has been getting you would think that it would be wise for any company or corporation not to buddy up with them. It just seems like PR101 to not associate with Scientology at all.

Let me make one thing very clear to all Americans:
Just because you have a flag that doesn't make you more American!
The fact that the American public is taking issue with this is.... beyond stupid, there are so many more important issues and if your letting this flag thing take up space in your head you need a lobotomy and quick! I' am truly sick of this flag waving way of thinking. Be proud to be a American, but please don't be blind.

I think your being a little unrealistic in your idea of what kind of jobs young people will be looking for. T.V. blogger and hair stylist? Yeah not so much. We are in bad times, but Great Depression? Really? Oh and President Hillary Haha thats laughable. I honestly hope your joking!

I don't understand?! Whats so wrong with the idea of wanting a job thats fulfilling? Everybody should be so lucky to have a job that makes them happy. I don't remember ever reading in a job description that the job should make you miserable. Yes and money be damned! We may be a recession, but that isn't our fault, perhaps if we had the revenue required to fight this war we wounldn't be in this pickle. But your right we should just all sell out our creative minds to become investment bankers. Who needs great literature or art or teachers, because we are in hard times and we as the people need to make up for our goverments faults in handling the economy.

I thought the whole idea of the olympics was to put aside the politics, to come together and compete. That is the olympic spirit isn't it? We have invited the Chinese to compete for years. Oh and nobody seemed to mind inviting Nazi Germany to compete years ago. Not to mention that China doesn't seem to mind lending us large amounts of money that we are in need of and is saving our ass in the stock market. Listen China has been doing this for years, they don't care what we think. They don't need or want our approval. Bush doesn't want to burn a bidge here...never thought I would say this, but he is doing the smart thing here.

So a naked woman grabbing on a man's crank shaft is not "sexually implicit" but a man with his middle finger in a chicks mouth is? Uh.... you lost me? A naked woman with her hand all over a man crotch area doesn't really lend a whole lot to the imagination. Look at it in the way a small child might see these two ads, a child of 5 or younger. A naked woman will draw their attention and leave them with a few questions that can not be so easily explained away. A picture with a finger in a woman's mouth, while the child may still have questions the ad won't be nearly as eye catching and could be easily explained with grace. Which would you be comfortable explaining to your child, if they saw either one of the ads?