Spurred by a litany of concerns about the Bush administration's use of its intelligence agencies, the House of Representatives passed legislation yesterday which significantly
expands Congress' role in managing the intelligence community. Naturally, they did so over the objections of those rascals in the White House, who went so far as to threaten to veto the bill if the many offending provisions weren't removed. Because we really think quite highly of you, we've gone ahead and summarized some of the specific provisions the White House opposes and excerpted their stated explanations for doing so:
"In some cases, a contractor may possess the best combination of skills and experience needed to collect vital information."
"There is no demonstrated need to spend additional taxpayer resources to provide for two inspectors general with competing jurisdiction over the same intelligence elements."
"This provision would interfere with the independent judgment of the CIA inspector general or director of the CIA as to what activities should be audited and when the audits should be conducted."
"Such a provision ... would undermine the fundamental compact between Congress and the President on reporting highly sensitive intelligence matters."
"This provision really isn't doing it for us. We actually spent a solid three hours just trying to figure out how you could possibly have thought that this was any of your business. Still, we appreciate the effort ;)"
"The administration agrees that there is a pressing need for something of this nature. Ask us again eight years ago."
"Are you serious??"
"Ummmm, no."
"Fuck off."
We might have fudged a few of those White House statements. But if you'd like to see a good example of how people in Washington officialdom tell each other to go piss up a rope, you can read the whole four page veto threat here.