|
< BACK TO Fresh Intelligence 90 Day Jane A Living, Breathing Hoax
JANE Q. DOE, WE PRESUME? 90 Day Jane, allegedly Or, she was never really in death's asphyxiating grip at all. First there were the clues that commenters posted on her site, pointing to Void, a site authored by a young woman who was startlingly similar to 90 Day Jane. (Void's author is reporting on a lump in her breast, leaving one to wonder if she's off suicide and onto cancer now). Back on 90 Day Jane, she wrote this on day 87: "I also wanted to use this blog to help answer the question of 'why' for anyone who knew me and also for myself. Your comments are certainly helping me do that—many of them in a good way." The site, explained its author a few hours before taking it down, was meant to pay tribute to Christine Chubbuck, a newscaster who shot herself in the head live on-air in 1974. "She was very vocal about her depression to those around her and gave every indication of her exact intentions leading up to the event," wrote 90 Day Jane. "Her story both inspired and terrified me because I can truly empathize with her rage and even her isolation. I wondered how Christine's life and subsequent suicide would play out in our time. Would the internet be yet another place of isolation to her or an escape?" In fact, it was a place where, even as readers watched the countdown to what they were lead to believe would be an online suicide, they requested, "...before you die, can you post pix of your clam?" Im just kind of curious as to what will come out of this? Further what do we (all those, including myself) who were eager to see the 90th day make of ourselves? Can it be justified as a social experiment? If she was, in fact, in the model of Chubbuck, how come she did not provide any means of interrupting her plans? As far as I can tell this just raises more questions than it answers. Posted by: greatgreatminds on February 13, 2008 11:36 AM cue handwringing about "people who egged her on", despite the fact that those people probably knew damn well that it was a hoax and were mocking her for that. Posted by: slinkimalinki on February 13, 2008 5:53 PM How can you punish people who "egged her on"? Freedom of Speech, Right? Posted by: Grymscowl on February 14, 2008 12:33 AM I wouldn't have felt guilty for egging her on, as the whole thing was obviously self publicising bollox. Has she been offered a book deal yet? Posted by: Fangirl on February 14, 2008 5:22 AM Advertisement you should take down the photo of this poor girl you are accusing. This is obviously not her and you have no proof. You are potentially destroying someone's life. Posted by: bloodshoteyes on February 15, 2008 8:05 PM |
|
|||