|
< BACK TO Fresh Intelligence Perverted Payday![]() ERCK'D Xavier He also expects to be paid a total of nearly $2 million by NBC through next year in "consulting fees" for Perverted Justice's role in setting up stings of functionally retarded creeps for Dateline's "To Catch a Predator" series, despite the fact that NBC has told him the show may get canceled. The information comes from the Perverted Justice Foundation's application for tax-exempt status, which was approved by the IRS last month—just in time to make donations in Mom and Dad's name for Christmas!—and then promptly made public. (Radar has written about Von Erck previously, notably here. That link will take you to an archived version of the article—we were forced to take the story off our servers in the face of repeated denial-of-service hack attacks from, um, somebody.) According to the application, NBC paid Perverted Justice $802,520 last year for the seven stings it conducted, roughly $115,000 per sting, including the November operation in Murphy, Texas, that resulted in the suicide of a local prosecutor who'd been caught in a sexually suggestive IM chat with a Perverted Justice decoy—NBC News cameras were waiting outside his home as he shot himself in the head with a pistol. Neither NBC nor Perverted Justice have ever confirmed precisely how much money the group earns from the Dateline collaboration, but previous reports pegged it at $100,000 per episode. Perverted Justice's three staff employees—Von Erck, who is president; Dennis Kerr, aka "Frag," who is chief financial officer; and Alison Shea, aka "Del Harvey," who is secretary—each earn $120,000 per year. According to a salary survey [pdf] by Nonprofit Times, the average executive director of a nonprofit pulled down less than $100,000 per year in 2005. Just under half of Perverted Justice's income last year went to covering those three salaries. Perverted Justice expected to earn another $450,000 from NBC in 2007 and $600,000 in 2008, but it's unclear how much of that will actually be paid. So far this year, the group appears to have conducted four stings: one in New Jersey that aired earlier this year and three in Kentucky that have yet to air and are expected to be combined into one episode. But according to a letter the foundation wrote to the IRS in July seeking an expedited review of the application, "NBC has expressed uncertainty as to whether it will continue to air" the Predator segments. If that happens, Perverted Justice would be left in a lurch—the group's fundraising target of $350,000 for next year wouldn't even cover Von Erck, Kerr, and Shea's salaries. NBC declined to comment. Aside from the NBC cash-cow, Perverted Justice had more than $300,000 in the bank last year and hopes to raise an additional $600,000 in grants and contributions by the end of 2008 from donors like Wal-Mart and Microsoft. It reported no charitable income in 2006, though, and as of July 2007, according to the application, no donors had stepped forward. Aside from stinging perverts, the group plans to educate parents and children about online dangers, and to develop do-it-yourself software kits to help cops track predators online and parents to monitor and control their kids' online activities. E-mailed for a response, Von Erck wrote: "Thanks for contacting us for comment, John. Unfortunately, you're not a legitimate reporter, you're just a rather scummy fellow who writes for a tabloid rag. Other than being told that you're a scummy hack who resembles a stalker more than a journalist, we don't have any comment for you on this issue or any other issue as you've already been told in the past. We wish you the best with your low-rent reporting gig...."
Just $800 grand? that's less than Ben Silverman drops on hookers and blow. Posted by: twitter on November 7, 2007 2:45 PM I'm pretty sure I could do the same thing for at least half the price. Are you listening NBC? Posted by: moneycashhos on November 7, 2007 2:52 PM Jesus. How many articles are you guys going to write about this guy? Seriously. Not even just stories, but using his name as points of comparison with random people in various pieces? Journalism shouldn't look like a personal vendetta. Not sure what your agenda is, but the fact that there IS one is pretty poor form. A few comments about the article itself: It takes about 2 minutes research to find that the DDoS'ing is from B. Raisley, who is featured in your Strange Bedfellows article. On his own blog (which I'm not linking to), he says you got that story wrong. He tries to wipe out all mentions of his name on the internet, which makes sense, considering the harassment he's faced. Writers like you didn't really do the poor guy a favor. While you infer that Perverted Justice is somehow responsible, the logical thing is to wonder why they left such a story alone for months and months when it was first published and actually got attention... only to try and take it down, when, the spring, summer? That makes no sense. Not to mention that the story has been copied elsewhere, so it's not like DDoS'ing it on the Radar site really keeps it down. Anyway, evidence of Raisley's doing: http://3hrb.blogspot.com/2007/10/mystery-deepens.html As for the rest of the article, it's rather shoddy to talk about averages. Most non-profits don't take in much when it comes to contributions, there are tons of non-profits out there. So, of course, their leaders don't get paid much. And if the average is less than $100,000 (what then, $90,000? $80,000? Pretty good sums!), the high end must be extraordinary. And I quickly found what the high end is: Let's take a look at the equivalent numbers I found this morning for Breakdown? Their top officers make $719,000. Later in the tax document, they list the top five employees that make the most that ARE NOT directors or officers, all make more than you claim the Perverted Justice directors make... with tens of thousands of benefits on top of that. Other salaries, including the top five non-director employees I just mentioned, total around $13.9 million. Pension plan contributions are $899,549. Other employee benefits? $1,876,497. They spend $1,829,802 on supplies, $714,000 on telephone, they spend more on postage than Perverted Justice pays its directors, $2 million on a physical office They received $9 million dollars from the government to run cybertipline, which is a useful service, but all they do is forward the tips to appropriate law enforcement when there are enough details to do so. That's a hell of a lot of cash just to do that. They blow a ton of cash on fundraising and management. Among other things. Documents here: Now if Perverted Justice was raking in government grants and tax dollars, I might even see where you're coming from when you criticize the ratio. They were just approved as a non-profit, which of course means they haven't taken in any charitable donations in all the time since they filed (that you discussed), and I don't see any donation links on their website. Well, looking at their site, there is a link to cafepress, but there's no one in the world that makes much money from that. But as it stands, all their money has come from a television show, a television show that surely pays Chris Hansen and others at NBC far more than it pays those who do the actual work. The "Fightin' pedophiles and predators" business is apparently lucrative, looking at these NCMEC stats, but Perverted Justice is clearly far from the top of the heap when it comes to those who profit from it. Your venom is misplaced, and your agenda makes for poor journalism. Posted by: justthefacts_dude on November 7, 2007 6:04 PM Jeez, obvious agenda much? Did someone at radar get busted by von Erck's group or something? How many articles on him are you going to do? And good lord, this is ancient news. Blow the dust off it. When you have to go dumpster diving for old news to produce yet another blatantly biased piece on the same guy you've smeared ad nauseum, I'd say that's a pretty good sign you need to stick to your league and find out what Paris Hilton is up to this week. Posted by: Ratchet on November 7, 2007 7:50 PM Advertisement I didn't realize people took Radar's reporting (or lack there of) so seriously. I've never picked up the magazine or gone to the website in hopes of something serious or hard-hitting. Mainly it's for a laugh or two. Posted by: etteloc on November 8, 2007 3:45 AM Someone call ABC and BEG them to make this into a reality TV Show, please. Posted by: SandraHotchkins on November 8, 2007 6:46 PM It's obvious the low life's from perverted jjustice have decided to inundate the comment section here with defensive posturing. Any adult who pretends to be a child and isn't formally trained, accredited, certified, licensed and employed to do so is just a severly dysfunctional individual hiding behind what they think is a good excuse. Emotionally disturbed people who place themselves in role playing situations to avoid the pain of their real lives and issues isn't helping anyone or anything. Perverted Justice has NEVER saved a REAL CHILD. The whole organiztion is a scam. Posted by: PeterPeterThePumpkin Eider on November 8, 2007 10:58 PM Gotta say: Love ya Radar! Keep chipping away at Perverted Justice. Posted by: bud on November 11, 2007 5:48 PM |
|
|
||