left arrow BackNext right arrow
< BACK TO Fresh Intelligence

Black Bloggers' Beef With Cosmogirl Contest

cosmogirl.jpg
DISCRIMINATING CONTEST Cosmo
Does Cosmogirl have a thing against black people? Though it may seem unlikely, several African-American bloggers are now asking whether their influence caused the cuddly teen magazine to change the rules of a contest.

The contest, cosponsored by Take Action Hollywood, invited teenagers to submit short films about a social issue. Earlier this year, the films were posted on Cosmogirl's website, where readers were encouraged to vote for their favorites. The winner will receive $10,000 and be featured in the magazine's August issue.

On April 5, Patrice Elizabeth Grell Yursik, who writes the blog Afrobella, posted a message encouraging readers to vote for the film by Kiri Davis, the only African-American among the remaining three semi-finalists. "I'm guessing that Kiri's film might not appeal to the typical CosmoGirl demographic," wrote Yursik. "But if you ask me, Kiri is the future." Angel La followed up with a similar message on Concrete Loop, and within a few days Davis's film went from last place to first place in the voting. The rules, as they stood, allowed each person to cast one vote per day.

[Watch a featurette on Davis's short film after the jump!]

When Yursik went to vote this morning, however, she discovered the following message: "We have determined that the online voting has been corrupted as a result of one or more instances of tampering with the voting process by users. As a result, none of the online votes will be counted, and we will submit all three of the semi-finalists to our panel of experts for final judging and selection of a winner."

"I don't want to be a conspiracy theorist by any means, but could this be because Kiri was actually—gasp—winning?" wrote Yursik. "Is encouraging black women who identify with her film's message to vote for Kiri somehow against competition rules?"

La, meanwhile, responded by asking readers to write to Cosmogirl and complain. She tells Radar that she suspects the vote-tampering claim is bogus: "I don't want to speculate, but I personally believe that it wasn't going in the direction they wanted it to go in."

She says she has yet to hear back from Hearst Magazines, which publishes Cosmogirl, about why the contest was suspended. (A Hearst spokeswoman told Radar she would look into it.)

UPDATE: Cosmogirl responds. A spokeswoman offered this statement to Radar, "It is disappointing that people are jumping to conclusions and making false accusations before the winner has been determined. The Cosmogirl Take Action Hollywood Film Contest online voting was eliminated because it had been compromised by online voters. As has always been the case, the final winner will be chosen by a panel of celebrity judges. The films from the three semi-finalists are all incredible works of art and we know that the judges have a tough decision to make. The winner will be featured in the August 2007 issue of Cosmogirl."

It just seems a little suspicious. If the rules are clear and unbreakable (one vote per day with an IP address identifier to prevent multiple votes from one user per day) then how can there be vote tampering?

The thing is, while young white females (the target demographic for the website) may have only been able to identify with only one or the other of the two documentaries by the white filmmakers, for the most part every young black female can relate to some or all of Ms. Davis' film. As such, there is a greater likelihood that there would be a concentration of votes for Ms. Davis' film.

The whole thing just seems a bit fishy.

If Cosmogirl were smart they would have left the contest as it was. They would have had in increase in a more diverse readership for the August issue and possibly been able to find a way to turn those readers into subscribers.

Posted by: tiaakimmi on April 13, 2007 4:00 PM

Not having watched the videos, I predict that Kiri Davis will have to win now. Hearst is smart. They know that if she doesn't win now, after they interfered with the voting process, they will have a PR DISASTER on their hands.

Posted by: Moon Over My Hammy on April 13, 2007 5:07 PM

1. Telling someone to vote for a film because it was by a black person is racist. Racism toward white is not only common but accepted by other races.

2. I've lost track of the times a person who was darker skinned than me (fair skinned) has taken issue with me based on my skin color. You can never avoid people like that no matter what color they come in so just move on.

The bottom line is that every one has problems and struggles in life. Very few people of any race or ethnic background are weathy. I worked my ass off for everything I have and was treated unfairly, for whatever reason, because that is what happens to everyone in life. Get over it! If there is a line for free stuff for white people then I never found it. You have to work hard in life no matter who you are or what you look like. It drive me nuts when people feel sorry for themselves for superficial reasons.

Posted by: Lanie on April 16, 2007 5:29 PM

Lanie,
Just because life isn't fair doesn't mean we have to sit back and allow people to treat us badly. Where would our world be if the generations before us stood by and kept allowing the abuse to continue instead of speaking out against the bad treatment? You aren't the only person that works hard. This young lady worked hard to become a finalist and didn't deserve the treatment she received. I voted for her not only because she is black but because of the video content. I have also received some bad treatment due to my light skin. I am not saying black people are perfect nor is any other race. Some people just have a problem with who they are. However I admire Kiri (dark or light) for taking out the time to produce something that she is passionate about and not just something that will please everyone. I don't feel like she or the girls in the film feel sorry for themselves like you stated. I look at it as speaking out against what they disagree with. Lastly, there is a thing called "white privilege" so lets not be naive. I am not saying white people get everything but blacks do have to work harder to get where they want to be in life. Yes everyone struggles and gets treated badly, but you don't always have to stand by and take the abuse.

Posted by: Dot on April 17, 2007 9:34 AM

Advertisement

It’s so nice to see that everyone is so passionate about this issue. The problem is that you are all way off base!!! This is not a black, white or green issue… it’s a cheating issue!!! I realized two days into the voting that something was wrong. Now I’m no computer genius, but it didn’t take me but five minutes to figure out how to beat the “Flash” voting system and vote as many times per day as I wanted (it wasn’t one vote per IP address as previously stated). If I could figure out the flaw in the system, anybody could. I’m ashamed to say that I did what I could to help my candidate (without her knowledge of course). My admission alone should constitute vote tampering. But while I was doing my thing, I watched the numbers role for the other two candidates faster and better then I could pop them in. The cheating was not exclusive to any race of people… it was universal. Clearly… all three candidates had friends who “enhanced” the voting for them. So while race relations may have a long way to go in this country, this minor contest should not be the battle field. As a great man once said, “sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.”

Posted by: BobbyC on April 18, 2007 11:53 AM

It’s so nice to see that everyone is so passionate about this issue. The problem is that you are all way off base!!! This is not a black, white or green issue… it’s a cheating issue!!! I realized two days into the voting that something was wrong. Now I’m no computer genius, but it didn’t take me but five minutes to figure out how to beat the “Flash” voting system and vote as many times per day as I wanted (it wasn’t one vote per IP address as previously stated). If I could figure out the flaw in the system, anybody could. I’m ashamed to say that I did what I could to help my candidate (without her knowledge of course). My admission alone should constitute vote tampering. But while I was doing my thing, I watched the numbers role for the other two candidates faster and better then I could pop them in. The cheating was not exclusive to any race of people… it was universal. Clearly… all three candidates had friends who “enhanced” the voting for them. So while race relations may have a long way to go in this country, this minor contest should not be the battle field. As a great man once said, “sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.”

Posted by: BobbyC on April 18, 2007 11:56 AM

Too bad it takes a rag as vapid and sub-standard as Cosmo for people became passionate over this issue. Whether it's a cheating or race issue, it's still Cosmo - bottom-feeding "reporting" at its finest and hardly worth the uproar!

Posted by: VelvetStaccato on April 20, 2007 10:25 AM